So it comes down to the influence of individuals, rather than the framework of the law they operate in.
[Paul would have to be much more intoxicated than he is to miss the implications here, but he'd have to be more sober to decide what to make of them, speaking of being caught between.]
What benefit do the advocate derive from the arrangement? I can imagine what their opponents gain through dominance over vulnerable individuals.
no subject
[Paul would have to be much more intoxicated than he is to miss the implications here, but he'd have to be more sober to decide what to make of them, speaking of being caught between.]
What benefit do the advocate derive from the arrangement? I can imagine what their opponents gain through dominance over vulnerable individuals.